Identifying Logical Fallacies | Critical Analysis Session | Islamic Messaging System

In this video, we take a deep dive into a video of “The Pakistan Experience” featuring host Shehzad Ghias, where we critically analyze the logical fallacies present in the discussion. Our team at IMS Critical Analysis Session carefully examines each argument, revealing the cognitive biases and explaining why people often fall into these fallacies.

Fallacies Addressed:

Ad Hominem – Attacking the person instead of addressing the argument.
Appeal to Pity – Manipulating emotions to win an argument rather than using valid reasoning.
Appeal to Authority – Believing something is true simply because an authority figure says so.
Straw man – Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack.
Red Herring – Distracting from the actual issue by bringing up an unrelated topic.
Join us as we debunk these fallacies and provide a clearer understanding of logical reasoning. By recognising these common errors, we can all become more critical thinkers and engage in more productive discussions.

???? Subscribe to IMS for more insightful content!
???? Hit the bell icon to get notified about our latest videos!

#islamicmessagingsystem #LogicalFallacies #CriticalThinking #IMS #ThePakistanExperience #ShehzadGhias #Debunking #AdHominem #AppealToPity #AppealToAuthority #Strawman #RedHerring #CognitiveBias