Analysis by Teen Mentorship Students of Sahil Adeem
This session delves into the contrasting views of Dr. Israr Ahmed and Javed Ahmad Ghamidi, two influential scholars who have shaped modern Islamic discourse in different ways. While both sought to revive Islamic thought, their approaches to Shariah, governance, and the role of Islam in society differ significantly.
Key Discussion Points:
???? Core Ideologies – Dr. Israr’s emphasis on an Islamic revolution vs. Ghamidi’s focus on reinterpretation of religious principles.
???? Islamic Governance & Shariah – Dr. Israr’s call for a political Islamic revival vs. Ghamidi’s stance on democracy, secularism, and the application of Shariah.
???? Approach to Quran & Sunnah – Differences in how both scholars interpret Islamic law, Hadith, and historical context.
???? Societal Impact – The influence of both scholars on modern Islamic thought, including their followers and critics.
Join us for an in-depth intellectual discussion exploring the implications of these views on modern Muslim identity and governance.
Link to the analyzed video: https://youtu.be/rZmbTvkTCgE?si=2sOFV8GhbKaGAHDx
#drisrarahmed #ghamdi #islam #Shariah #analysis #sahiladeem #IMS
Recent Comments